
网上有些很好的课,这是其中之一 http://justiceharvard.org/ Justice by Harvard Professor Michael Sandel Episode One: Part 1 - The Moral Side of Murder: If you had to choose between (1) killing one person to save the lives of five others and (2) doing nothing, even though you knew that five people would die right before your eyes if you did nothing—what would you do? What would be the right thing to do? That’s the hypothetical scenario Professor Michael Sandel uses to launch his course on moral reasoning. Part 2 - The Case for Cannibalism: Sandel introduces the principles of utilitarian philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, with a famous nineteenth century law case involving a shipwrecked crew of four. After nineteen days lost at sea, the captain decides to kill the cabin boy, the weakest amongst them, so they can feed on his blood and body to survive. Moral Reasoning *Consequentialist -- Locates morality in the consequences of an act *Categorical -- Locates morality in certain duties and rights http://justiceharvard.org/index.php?opt ... 1&Itemid=8 ---------------------- Episode Two Part 1 - PUTTING A PRICE TAG ON LIFE: Sandel presents some contemporary cases in which cost-benefit analysis was used to put a dollar value on human life. The cases give rise to several objections to the utilitarian logic of seeking “the greatest good for the greatest number.” Is it possible to sum up and compare all values using a common measure like money? Part 2 - HOW TO MEASURE PLEASURE: Sandel introduces J. S. Mill, a utilitarian philosopher who argues that seeking “the greatest good for the greatest number” is compatible with protecting individual rights, and that utilitarianism can make room for a distinction between higher and lower pleasures. Sandel tests this theory by playing video clips from three very different forms of entertainment: Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the reality show Fear Factor, and The Simpsons "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied. Better to be Socrates dissatisfied tan a fool satisfied. And if the foll or the pig are of a different opinion, it is because they only know their side of te questions."---- John Stuart Mill "Justice is a name for certain moral requirements, which , regarded collectively, stand higher in the scale of social utility and are therefore more paramount obligation than any others." --- John Stuart Mill http://justiceharvard.org/index.php?opt ... 2&Itemid=9
Justice with Michael Sandel-- Episode 3
Part 1 - FREE TO CHOOSE: With humorous references to Bill Gates and Michael Jordan, Sandel introduces the libertarian notion that redistributive taxation—taxing the rich to give to the poor—is akin to forced labor.
PART 2 - WHO OWNS ME?: Students first discuss the arguments behind redistributive taxation. If you live in a society that has a system of progressive taxation, aren’t you obligated to pay your taxes? Don’t many rich people often acquire their wealth through sheer luck or family fortune? A group of students dubbed “Team Libertarian” volunteers to defend the libertarian philosophy against these objections.
http://justiceharvard.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=33&Itemid=10
学坏容易学好难~~
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
Justice with Michael Sandel 第6和7节
Part 1 - MIND YOUR MOTIVE: Professor Sandel introduces Immanuel Kant, a challenging but influential philosopher. Kant rejects utilitarianism. He argues that each of us has certain fundamental duties and rights that take precedence over maximizing utility. Kant rejects the notion that morality is about calculating consequences. When we act out of duty—doing something simply because it is right—only then do our actions have moral worth.
Part 2 - SUPREME PRINCIPLE OF MORALITY: Immanuel Kant says that insofar as our actions have moral worth, what confers moral worth is our capacity to rise above self-interest and inclination and to act out of duty. Sandel tells the true story of a thirteen-year-old boy who won a spelling bee contest, but then admitted to the judges that he had, in fact, misspelled the final word.
http://justiceharvard.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=43&Itemid=13
Part 1 - A LESSON IN LYING: Immanuel Kant believed that telling a lie, even a white lie, is a violation of one’s own dignity. Professor Sandel asks students to test Kant’s theory with this hypothetical case: if your friend were hiding inside your home, and a person intent on killing your friend came to your door and asked you where he was, would it be wrong to tell a lie? This leads to a video clip of one of the most famous, recent examples of dodging the truth: President Clinton talking about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
Part 2 - A DEAL IS A DEAL: Sandel introduces the modern philosopher, John Rawls, who argues that a fair set of principles would be those principles we would all agree to if we had to choose rules for our society and no one had any unfair bargaining power.
http://justiceharvard.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=44&Itemid=14
这两节讲康德,值得听!朝闻道啊,哈哈。
这里面已经不再争论“即使为了好的目的,也不能用人民作为工具,当然更不能以牺牲他人权益为多数人谋幸福”,而是道德律和个人自由的关系,有没有最高道德律,比如是“你”选择了以道德方式行事(DUTY),说谎不诚实是触犯你自己的尊严。最高道德律是普世的,是靠人的纯粹理性,也就是不屈从外部理由而选择的道德律。
学坏容易学好难~~
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
欣欣,
找到了这条线。马上就给儿子推荐这个网站。如果太深奥了,就让他明年再试。(他昨天忽然对我大提731部队,在网上找了好多资料看。奇怪。)
你还提过几个网站, TED什么的,我当时手里没有笔,没有记下。能在此再说一下吗?谢谢!
PA Resident
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
在这里,我感觉哈佛那堂课,你儿子听可能深了。
http://www.ted.com/
欣欣,
找到了这条线。马上就给儿子推荐这个网站。如果太深奥了,就让他明年再试。(他昨天忽然对我大提731部队,在网上找了好多资料看。奇怪。)
你还提过几个网站, TED什么的,我当时手里没有笔,没有记下。能在此再说一下吗?谢谢!
学坏容易学好难~~
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
谢谢!
好象这个TED对我儿子比较合适。
我在找一个speech class和writing class,想在今年暑假让儿子在这方面接受一些比较专业训练。有谁有好主意,先谢了!(儿子的写作和表达能力在学校里算好的,但到校外一比,他就差远了。)
在这里,我感觉哈佛那堂课,你儿子听可能深了。
http://www.ted.com/
PA Resident
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
最好的方法,是让他读报纸和杂志。好像有少年版的《时代周刊》之类的。没有阅读,根本不可能有写作;即使写了,也不能提高。美国的报刊杂志,集中了一些精英写作人才。此外还有读经典名著。《金银岛》的英文就非常好,哪怕是背一些,我觉得都是有益的。
另外就是鼓励他写,培养他写的兴趣。这个班那个班的,我觉得基本上没什么用,教的都是一些八股一样的东西,文法句法之类。
谢谢!
好象这个TED对我儿子比较合适。
我在找一个speech class和writing class,想在今年暑假让儿子在这方面接受一些比较专业训练。有谁有好主意,先谢了!(儿子的写作和表达能力在学校里算好的,但到校外一比,他就差远了。)
在这里,我感觉哈佛那堂课,你儿子听可能深了。
http://www.ted.com/
一下一下又一下……
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
谢!
儿子(13岁)已经在看普通版的“时代”了。写作课可能没有多少用,但好的speech class也许真有帮助,除非小孩有演说天分(我儿子肯定没有)。知道有不少名嘴上过这种课。在美国,能说会道比能干实事重要得多。(当然,我的目标是让他能说又能做。)
最好的方法,是让他读报纸和杂志。好像有少年版的《时代周刊》之类的。没有阅读,根本不可能有写作;即使写了,也不能提高。美国的报刊杂志,集中了一些精英写作人才。此外还有读经典名著。《金银岛》的英文就非常好,哪怕是背一些,我觉得都是有益的。
另外就是鼓励他写,培养他写的兴趣。这个班那个班的,我觉得基本上没什么用,教的都是一些八股一样的东西,文法句法之类。
PA Resident
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
http://oyc.yale.edu/music/listening-to-music/content/downloads
这里还有三个链接都是那天我提到的。
学坏容易学好难~~
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
谢谢!这下,够儿子忙了。过段时间,让他谢杜老师。
http://oyc.yale.edu/music/listening-to-music/content/downloads
这里还有三个链接都是那天我提到的。
PA Resident
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
一下一下又一下……
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
谢一下子。
表达的方式其实也不简单。看过你的几场CND著名架,大家都受益匪浅:原来一句话还有那么多说法。(
开玩笑。)
PA Resident
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
今天回家,儿子告诉我说,他早在听TED了,是他的一个大孩子朋友(现在在Princeton上学)推荐的。
另外几个网站他不知道。
他让我谢谢杜老师。
在这里,我感觉哈佛那堂课,你儿子听可能深了。
http://www.ted.com/
PA Resident
Re: 听课去(2)Justic with Michael Sandel
提一下这线。
学坏容易学好难~~